000			03227nam a2200385Ia 4500
001			1090
005			20240531101624.0
008			190513t2023 ne a 000 0 eng d
020			_a9789463667913
040			_aUISEK-EC _bspa _erda
082	0	4	_a720 _b L783in 2023
100	1		_aLiu Cheng, Alexander _916076 _eaut
245	1	5	_aThe Intelligent Built-Environment as Cyber-Physical System / _cAlexander Liu Cheng
264			_aPaíses Bajos: _bA+BE | Architecture and the Built Environment, _c2023
300			_a272 páginas: _bilustraciones; _c23 cm
336			_atxt
337			_2rdamedia _an
338			_2rdacarrier _anc
490			_aA+BE Arquitecture and built environment _916079 _v23-24
500			_aDisertación para la obtención del Doctorado en la Universidad Tecnológica de Delft
505			_aState of the art - Theory and concept - Demonstrator environments - Demonstrators – Conclusions
520			_aThis thesis presents an alternative approach to intelligence in the built-environment, departing from the two established yet divergent branches in the discourse: the Technical, centered around Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs), and represented by Ambient Intelligence (AmI) and Ambient Assisted Living (AAL); and the Architectural, centered around architectural / spatial experiences and considerations, and represented by Interactive Architecture and Adaptive Architecture. The promise of both AmI/AAL and IA/AA is constrained by rigid and increasingly outdated assumptions in their approaches—i.e., AmI’s / AAL’s approach to the built-environment, and IA’s / AA’s approach to ICTs. Moreover, it is impossible to combine them to yield a cohesive system due to disparity in their typical Technology Readiness Levels. That is, the sophistication of a system depends on that of its mutually complementing subsystems; and two or more subsystems may not mutually complement, sustain, and/or support one another if their levels of development do not correspond. Consequently, the presented alternative conceives the intelligent built-environment as a Cyber-Physical System. Under this approach, ICTs and Architectural considerations in conjunction instantiate intelligence fundamentally. The presented approach’s promise is illustrated via its application to a constrained use-case focused on the elderly. Twelve proof-of-concept demonstrators are developed based on key parameters pertaining to Indoor Environmental Quality and Quality of Life. While each demonstrator is presented as a discrete proof-of-concept, all build on the same core System Architecture and technological ecosystem, and are intended to be viewed as a collection of systems and services expressed within a same hypothetical environment.
526			_aArquitectura
650	1	7	_aArquitectura _2lemb _911 _xAmbientes inteligentes
650	2	7	_aArquitectura _2lemb _911 _xInteractiva
653			_aConstrucción de ambientes inteligentes
856			_uhttp://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:117ba361-fc12-4746-a108-3d554fbc5bab
901			_a0000-00-00 00:00:00
902			_a0
903			_a2
904			_aY
905			_aN
942			_cBK
999			_c1064 _d1064